The integrity of democracy in the UK faces scrutiny amid concerns over the rise of Islamic Sharia law.

In recent years, there has been a growing concern among some individuals that democracy in the UK, as well as in other European countries like Belgium and France, may be replaced by Islamic Sharia law. One prominent figure who has expressed this view is British Islamic scholar Anjem Choudary. Choudary has made controversial statements suggesting that Sharia law will become the dominant legal system in these countries within the next 15-20 years.

British Islamic scholar Anjem Chaudary: “Democracy will most likely be replaced by Islamic Sharia law in the UK, Belgium and France within 15-20 years.”

It looks like an accurate prediction.
pic.twitter.com/dtH5qAH7sj

— Dr. Eli David (@DrEliDavid) May 5, 2024

The Role of Anjem Choudary

Anjem Choudary is a well-known figure in the UK, particularly within the Muslim community. He is the former leader of the now-banned extremist group Al-Muhajiroun and has been associated with radical views and activities. Choudary’s statements about the potential replacement of democracy with Sharia law have attracted significant attention and sparked debates about the future of the UK’s legal system.

The Relationship Between Islamic Sharia Law and Democracy

It is important to understand the fundamental differences between Islamic Sharia law and democracy to assess the likelihood of such a transition occurring. Sharia law is a legal system based on the principles and teachings of Islam. It encompasses various aspects of life, including personal conduct, family matters, and criminal justice. On the other hand, democracy is a system of government where power is vested in the people, who exercise it either directly or through elected representatives.

At first glance, the implementation of Sharia law may seem incompatible with the principles of democracy, as it places religious teachings as the ultimate source of law. However, it is essential to note that many Muslim-majority countries have blended elements of Sharia law with democratic principles, creating hybrid legal systems. These countries have found ways to accommodate both religious and civil laws within their legal frameworks.

The Current Legal Framework in the UK

In the UK, the legal system is primarily based on common law, which has evolved over centuries and is not explicitly tied to any religious doctrine. The UK also recognizes the supremacy of parliamentary sovereignty, which means that laws passed by Parliament are the ultimate authority. While there is no formal recognition of Sharia law within the UK’s legal system, there are instances where Sharia principles have been applied in matters of family law through arbitration and mediation.

It is important to emphasize that the application of Sharia law in the UK is limited and voluntary. It is only applicable when individuals willingly choose to resolve their disputes in accordance with Sharia principles. The UK legal system ensures that the rights and freedoms of all individuals, regardless of their religious beliefs, are protected.

The Unlikelihood of Sharia Law Replacing Democracy

While Anjem Choudary’s statements have garnered attention, it is crucial to approach them with skepticism. The idea of Islamic Sharia law replacing democracy in the UK, Belgium, and France within the next 15-20 years seems highly unlikely for several reasons.

Firstly, the UK has a long-standing tradition of democratic values and institutions. The principles of democracy, such as the rule of law, individual freedoms, and equality, are deeply ingrained in British society. Any significant change to the legal system would require widespread support and a democratic process, which seems improbable given the current sentiments and the commitment to democratic principles.

Secondly, the UK has a strong legal framework that protects individual rights and freedoms. The Human Rights Act, incorporated into UK law in 1998, enshrines the European Convention on Human Rights, which safeguards fundamental rights and freedoms. Any attempt to replace democracy with Sharia law would likely face legal challenges and scrutiny under these provisions.

Lastly, the UK is a diverse and multicultural society that values pluralism and the coexistence of different religious and cultural traditions. The government and institutions are committed to promoting social cohesion and ensuring that all individuals are treated equally under the law. The introduction of Sharia law as the dominant legal system would contradict these principles and risk undermining the social fabric of the country.

Promoting Dialogue and Understanding

While the concerns raised by Anjem Choudary and others should not be dismissed outright, it is important to approach the topic with nuance and critical thinking. Engaging in constructive dialogue and fostering understanding between different communities is crucial for maintaining social harmony and upholding democratic values.

The UK’s legal system is founded on the principles of democracy and the rule of law, and any changes to it would require a broad consensus and a democratic process. As of now, there is no evidence or indication that Islamic Sharia law will replace democracy in the UK, Belgium, or France within the next 15-20 years. British Army also lifted ban on serving soldiers having beards recently.

It is essential to continue promoting tolerance, inclusivity, and respect for the rule of law to ensure a harmonious and cohesive society in which all individuals, regardless of their religious beliefs, can thrive.